Re: [PATCH] tty: serial_core: Fix the incorrect configuration of baud rate and data length at the console serial port resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2019年5月14日周二 下午3:35写道:

>
> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 01:42:39PM +0800, Lanqing Liu wrote:
> > When userspace opens a serial port for console, uart_port_startup()
> > is called. This function assigns the uport->cons->cflag value to
> > TTY->termios.c_cflag, then it is cleared to 0. When the user space
> > closes this serial port, the TTY structure will be released, and at
> > this time uport->cons->cflag has also been cleared.
> >
> > On the Spreadtrum platform, in some special scenarios, like charging mode,
> > userspace needs to close the console, which means the uport->cons->cflag
> > has also been cleared. But printing logs is still needed in the kernel. So
> > when system enters suspend and resume, the console needs to be configure
> > the baud rate and data length of the serial port according to its own cflag
> > when resuming the console port. At this time, the cflag is 0, which will
> > cause serial port to produce configuration errors that do not meet user
> > expectations.
>
> This is actually yet another regression due to 761ed4a94582 ("tty:
> serial_core: convert uart_close to use tty_port_close") which
> incidentally removed the call to uart_shutdown() where the cflag was
> being saved precisely to avoid the problem you're describing:
>
>         ae84db9661ca ("serial: core: Preserve termios c_cflag for console resume")

Yes, agree with you.

>
> Judging from a quick look it seems the xmit buf, which is released in
> that function may now be leaking too.

We haven't found this issue before, but we can try to reproduce it on
our platform.

>
> > To fix this, assigning the TTY->termios.c_cflag value to uport->cons->cflag
> > before the userspace closes this console serial port. It will ensure that
> > the correct cflag value can be gotten when the console serial port was
> > resumed.
>
> Not sure this is the right fix, but I don't have time to look at this
> right now.

OK. Thanks for your comments.




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux