On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 07:59:53AM +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > On 12.03.19 17:33, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 03:57:33PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > >> --- > >> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c | 12 ++++-------- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > No changelog or signed-off-by, sorry, please fix up the series and > > resend. > > Maybe the threading got messed up somehow (at least my tbird doesn't > show it correctly), so you've probably didn't see my intro letter: there > I wrote that this is yet WIP, not meant for actual submission, instead > just to ask you folks whether my approach in general would be work. > Threading worked just fine, but you still shouldn't send out patches like this without any independant information in the patch itself saying what it does and what it is for. That's just bad engineering :) Also, usually RFC like patches and series are ignored, I know I almost always ignore them because if the author doesn't think they are ready to be reviewed, why would I spend time on them compared to other patches that their authors think are ready for review. Remember, patch review is the most limited resource we have. thanks, greg k-h
