Re: [PATCH] tty: not call tty close in fallback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14. 01. 19, 7:56, yes@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> when fail to open tty, tty is not in open status and not need
> to call close

But tty drivers are special and expect close even on failed open, right?
See tty_open.

> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
> index fa1672993b4c..bcc1e27d00de 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int ttyport_open(struct serdev_controller *ctrl)
>  
>  	ret = tty->ops->open(serport->tty, NULL);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto err_close;
> +		goto err_unlock;
>  
>  	tty_unlock(serport->tty);
>  
> @@ -142,8 +142,6 @@ static int ttyport_open(struct serdev_controller *ctrl)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> -err_close:
> -	tty->ops->close(tty, NULL);
>  err_unlock:
>  	tty_unlock(tty);
>  	tty_release_struct(tty, serport->tty_idx);
> 

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux