[dropping everyone else while we discuss the code] Thanks. I assume that branch as all the code that there is. Let me look and get back to you. On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Here's my current code: > > https://github.com/cyndis/linux/commits/wip/t194-tcu-4 > > "fixup! mailbox: tegra-hsp: Add support for shared mailboxes" splits up the > controller into two. "tegra-hsp: use polling" changes it to use polling. > > There are two lines in the top patch with comments: > > - at the end of tegra_hsp_mailbox_send_data, I left a "while > (!tegra_hsp_mailbox_last_tx_done(chan));". Without it I wasn't able to see > even a few garbled characters in the output. > > - as mentioned, if I enable tx_block on the client side, I get a BUG: > scheduling while atomic. I assume this gets printed through the earlycon as > it's printing out correctly. > > Thanks, > Mikko > > > On 08.08.2018 17:46, Mikko Perttunen wrote: >> >> On 08/08/2018 05:39 PM, Jassi Brar wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 8:04 PM, Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08/08/2018 05:10 PM, Jassi Brar wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@xxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 04.08.2018 13:45, Mikko Perttunen wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 08/03/2018 03:54 PM, Jassi Brar wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Mikko Perttunen >>>>>>>> <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Add a new TXDONE option, TXDONE_BY_BLOCK. With this option, the >>>>>>>>> send_data function of the mailbox driver is expected to block until >>>>>>>>> the message has been sent. The new option is used with the Tegra >>>>>>>>> Combined UART driver to minimize unnecessary overhead when >>>>>>>>> transmitting >>>>>>>>> data. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1) TXDONE_BY_BLOCK flag :- >>>>>>>> Have you tried setting the flag >>>>>>>> mbox_chan->mbox_client->tx_block >>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No - I suppose I should have done that. I'm a bit concerned about >>>>>>> overhead >>>>>>> as send_data may be called thousands of times per second, so I tried >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> make >>>>>>> it as close as possible to the downstream driver that just pokes the >>>>>>> mailbox >>>>>>> register directly. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I tried using polling in the mailbox framework. Some printing is done >>>>>> from >>>>>> atomic context so it seems tx_block cannot be used - >>>>>> wait_for_completion_timeout understandably does not work in atomic >>>>>> context. >>>>>> I also tried without tx_block, in which case I got some horribly >>>>>> garbled >>>>>> output, but "Try increasing MBOX_TX_QUEUE_LEN" was readable there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any opinions? >>>>>> >>>>> The problems arise because your hardware (SM) supports TXDONE_BY_POLL, >>>>> but your client drives it by TXDONE_BY_ACK because the older DB >>>>> channels are so. >>>>> >>>>> Please populate SM channels as a separate controller than DB. >>>>> The DB controller, as is, run by ACK method. >>>>> The SM controller should be run by polling, i.e, set txdone_poll = >>>>> true and the poll period small enough. The virtual tty client driver >>>>> should be able to safely set tx_block from appropriate context. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Sorry, I should have clarified that I already split up the controllers. >>>> The >>>> SM controller has txdone_poll = true. I didn't adjust txpoll_period so I >>>> guess it's zero. >>>> >>> Can you please share your code (controller and client) ? Maybe offline >>> if you wish. >>> >> >> I'll upload a git branch tomorrow -- I'm not at the machine with the code >> now. >> >> Mikko >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
