On 03/07/2016 08:54 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:39:19 +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> writes: >>> I know that's a small amount of code, and I love reducing the number of >>> options in Kconfig, however I don't think it is fair to enlarge >>> everyone's kernel for a few systems that can't stick to a standard. >>> That must be the reason why the option was added in the first place and >>> I am not questioning this decision. I hate dead code in my kernel even >>> more than Kconfig clutter ;-) >> >> What about the other bits that are only there to support some obscure >> 8250 variant? > > Don't they already all have CONFIG_8250_* options to select them in or > out? No, that would be prohibitive; so many variants. I have no objection to just dropping the ifdef from 8250_port.c Regards, Peter Hurley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
