Hi
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Does one of the ACPI SYS descriptors at least claim ioport 2e-2f
> or 4e-4f?
I found this one.
Device (SYSR)
{
Name (_HID, EisaId ("PNP0C02") /* PNP Motherboard
Resources */) // _HID: Hardware ID
Name (_UID, 0x02) // _UID: Unique ID
Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () // _CRS: Current
Resource Settings
{
IO (Decode16,
0x0022, // Range Minimum
0x0022, // Range Maximum
0x01, // Alignment
0x02, // Length
)
IO (Decode16,
0x002E, // Range Minimum
0x002E, // Range Maximum
0x01, // Alignment
0x02, // Length
)
IO (Decode16,
0x004E, // Range Minimum
0x004E, // Range Maximum
0x01, // Alignment
0x02, // Length
)
...
>
>> If I have to guess I would say that all the fintek serial ports on the
>> field are declared only as PNP0501, not only my board :S
>
> Probably.
>
> Now I'm wondering if we should just probe this as a standard part of
> the 8250 port driver's autoconfig() instead.
>
> The PNP id isn't really adding more confidence to whether this is a
> Super I/O device.
I dont think that I fully understand you here. Do you mean that
fintek_8250_proble should be called inside
autoconfig in8250_port.c, regardless its pnp id?
Thanks for your help!
>
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
--
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
