Re: [PATCH] n_tty: Remove LINEMODE support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Hurley wrote:
On 01/18/2015 05:45 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
Peter Hurley wrote:
Commit 26df6d13406d1 ("tty: Add EXTPROC support for LINEMODE") added
the undocumented EXTPROC input processing mode, which ignores the ICANON
setting and forces pty slave input to be processed in non-canonical
mode.

What's the motivation to remove this code, rather than improve it if it
needs fixing? It has been removed from the Linux kernel at least once
before already, and that was a mistake back then too.

It is a significant maintenance burden, and I have concerns about the
level of support it's receiving. Here's some outstanding issues:

1. No man page documentation. At a minimum, tty_ioctl(4) and termios(3)
    need the userspace visible definitions and behavior documented. Better
    would be a LINEMODE (7) description of how this implementation works
    wrt supporting RFC 1116.

That can be added easily enough. Historically EXTPROC has had very little documentation of its own. E.g. the FreeBSD manpage only shows that the flag exists.

https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=termios&sektion=4

2. read(), poll()/select() and ioctl() with and without EXTPROC need to
    have _identical_ userspace behavior.

OK, this can be fixed.

3. Does the local edit guarantee canon lines <= 4096 chars? What happens
    if pty slave reader does this?

	char buffer[4096];
	char *p = buffer;

	n = read(tty, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
	if (n <= 0)
		goto done;
	while (*p++ != '\n')
		;

This reader is broken, since the tty driver supports EOL and EOL2 and this code doesn't account for it.

In practice your concern is misdirected - it's the job of whatever code is talking to the pty master to send valid data to the pty slave. There's no reason for the tty driver to second-guess the app here.

4. ioctl(TIOCSIG) can send _any_ signal to a different process without
    permission checks. That's not good.

It can only send to the pty slave. Permissions were already checked when the pty master was opened. What further checks do you think are needed? You think it should be limited to tty-specific signals: INT, QUIT, CONT, TSTP, TTIN, TTOU, WINCH?

5. This needs to work with readline(). Right now, I don't see how this
    won't have worst-case behavior, constantly sending termios changes,
    with scripted input where the reader switches back-and-forth between
    canonical and non-canonical mode (like readline() does). Database
    shells behave like this, but you can do a 20-line shell mockup with
    just readline().

readline() patched accordingly https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/gnu.bash.bug/o0UA55AhADs will cooperate. Sending one or two termios changes per input line is still far better than one character-at-a-time packets back and forth.

6. EXTPROC still does some input processing on the server. For example,
    7-bit mode (ISTRIP), tolower mode (IUCLC) and processing while
    closing; if input processing is being done on the local/client side,
    why the extra work here?

That's defensive, on the assumption that something else might break if e.g. the tty expected only 7-bit input but 8-bit characters were sent to it.

7. This needs a reference userspace implementation which for the moment
    could double as regression testing. A library with unit tests would
    be ideal.

telnet/telnetd can probably used as a starting point for this.

ISTM the right implementation, if there is one, is for EXTPROC to process
input exactly like raw mode except that line termination wakes up read_wait
and there is no special casing in read/poll.

I agree that this sounds simpler but I feel there's a reason (which I can't remember at the moment) that it doesn't work out that way.

Does SLC_FORW1 & SLC_FORW2
map directly to termios.c_cc[] line termination values?

Maps exactly to VEOL / VEOL2.

I'd like to do away with the signalling part; just turn off EXTPROC
and send the appropriate signalling char from the pty master, like telnetd
does now. Same for EOF.

That introduces additional mode changes, which you were just worrying about above, re: readline. It would make the traffic stream less efficient overall.

--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux