Hi,
W dniu 2014-10-04 18:19, Fabio Estevam pisze:
Janusz,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Janusz Uzycki <j.uzycki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So I'm deleting all of these now, please resend the latest
versions you have, with properly versioning
and order information.
Sure. If you don't want to comment dirty patches
I will not send you them.
I can send you only the final version, commented before.
On the moment this patch is ready to apply.
[PATCH RESEND] serial: mxs-auart: add sysrq support
The patch is resent to apply.
What Greg is asking you to do is to provide a proper version
annotation in your patches.
For example: [PATCH v2] serial: mxs-auart: add ...
Then if you need to submit it again you should do:
[PATCH v3] serial: mxs-auart: add ...
I will resend the rest of patches (as v4) this week.
This simple patch is independent from the previous patchset so
I decided to resubmit it alone ([PATCH RESEND] header used)
to apply.
I rather shouldn't resend the patch again I guess.
I sent the same initial version of the patch twice
after Greg's email so I did mess enough I think.
Also, always explain below the --- line what changed from one version to another
I thought composing cover letter is the only solution for resent patch
or series.
As I understood this way is appropriate for single patch only (not patch
set).
"Below" - it means between the line and diffstat?
Should I add new/second '---' line before diffstat?
best regards
Janusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
