Hello David
Thanks for you comments, I thought it was a good idea that the same
ioctl had the same value on all the arch, sorry to make a mess on your
file :)
I have just resend a v2 of the patch.
Regards!
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:26 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 20:08:30 +0200
>
>> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h b/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h
>> index 897d172..4e1c5da 100644
>> --- a/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h
>> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/ioctls.h
>> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>> #define TIOCGPKT _IOR('T', 0x38, int) /* Get packet mode state */
>> #define TIOCGPTLCK _IOR('T', 0x39, int) /* Get Pty lock state */
>> #define TIOCGEXCL _IOR('T', 0x40, int) /* Get exclusive mode state */
>> +#define TIOCGRS485 0x542E
>> +#define TIOCSRS485 0x542F
>
> Please follow the ioctl numbering scheme used by the particular
> architecture UAPI file you are editing.
>
> Since Sparc here is using incrementing _IO*() values, including the type
> for the object passed in/out of the ioctl, you should do similarly for
> TIOC{G,S}RS485.
--
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
