On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:58:45AM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote: > 2014-04-25 17:58 GMT+02:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 04:52:36PM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote: > >> This patch series is a leftover of http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314242.html > >> that missed 3.15 because it caused merge conflicts. > >> > >> The 1st patch may be applied as a fix for 3.15-rc, since it correct a > >> device tree binding documentation example. > >> > >> Greg, for you to decide if it's worth it or not ! > > > > Why am I the one tho decides if it is worth it? If it's up to me, I'll > > just say "no", as I sure don't need this for any of my machines... > > Ok, let me reformulate :) : > > This patch series is a leftover of > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314242.html > that missed 3.15 because it caused merge conflicts (you acked the > series and ask me to resend it during 3.15-rc cycle). > > I think that "[PATCH 1/5] tty/serial: atmel_serial: Fix device tree > documentation" should be applied on 3.15-rc, > since it corrects a device tree binding documentation example. > > The patches 2-5/5 are for 3.16. Ok, can you resend these, with a note that the first one should make it to 3.15-final, and I'll queue them up? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
