Re: [PATCH 3/5] tty/8250_dw: Add support for OCTEON UARTS.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/19/2013 03:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 18 June 2013 12:12:53 David Daney wrote:
+static unsigned int dw8250_serial_inq(struct uart_port *p, int offset)
+{
+       offset <<= p->regshift;
+
+       return (u8)__raw_readq(p->membase + offset);
+}
+
+static void dw8250_serial_outq(struct uart_port *p, int offset, int value)
+{
+       struct dw8250_data *d = p->private_data;
+
+       if (offset == UART_LCR)
+               d->last_lcr = value;
+
+       offset <<= p->regshift;
+       __raw_writeq(value, p->membase + offset);
+       dw8250_serial_inq(p, UART_LCR);
+}

This breaks building on 32 bit architectures as I found on my daily ARM
builds: __raw_writeq cannot be defined on architectures that don't have
native 64 bit data access instructions.

I will rework the patch to avoid this problem.


It's also wrong to use the
__raw_* variant, which is not guaranteed to be atomic and is not
endian-safe.

We do runtime probing and only use this function on platforms where it is appropriate, so atomicity is not an issue. As for endianess, I used the __raw_ variant precisely because it is correct for both big and little endian kernels.

David Daney


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux