Re: NULL primary_path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/12/2013 12:18 PM, Karl Heiss wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Karl Heiss <kheiss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/11/2013 06:44 PM, Karl Heiss wrote:

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On 03/09/2013 03:19 PM, Karl Heiss wrote:


On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Karl Heiss <kheiss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


On 03/08/2013 10:37 AM, Karl Heiss wrote:



On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:



On 03/08/2013 09:31 AM, Karl Heiss wrote:




On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Karl Heiss <kheiss@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:




On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Vlad Yasevich
<vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:




On 03/07/2013 04:51 PM, Karl Heiss wrote:





On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Vlad Yasevich
<vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:





On 03/07/2013 12:06 PM, Karl Heiss wrote:






The issue appears to manifest itself when the connection is
closed
from the remote end and getsockopt(SCTP_STATUS) is called
within
a
small window in which the association is still valid but
asoc->peer.primary_path is NULL.







Aha!  Thanks.  There was a bug in the rcu clean-up that allowed
the
association to remain while all transports have been removed.

Here is a patch that should have addressed this condition:

commit 8c98653f05534acd1cb07ea4929702a3659177d1
Author: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Feb 1 04:37:43 2013 +0000

          sctp: sctp_close: fix release of bindings for deferred
call_rcu's

Full patch is here:





http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8c98653f05534acd1cb07ea4929702a3659177d1

Make sure that you have this patch in the kernel you are
running

-vlad




Unfortunately this patch wont apply to the version of the SCTP
stack
that we are using (2.6.36.2) since it does not have a
sctp_transport_destroy_rcu() function.  Is there any chance that
simply swapping the order of the instructions without moving
them
would have any effect?  I ask this hypothetically because the
race
condition window seems to be difficult to recreate, thus nothing
to
test against (aside from in the field!).

Karl


Hi Karl

I think I see the problem now.  The problem happens when the
association
is
destroyed.  We delay removing the association from
the association id pool until all references on the association
have dropped.  As a result, it is possible (for a very short
period of time) for an association structure to still exist in
the kernel and still be found via the association id, but that
association
has no transports and is about to be completely destroyed.

This is a really interesting race and I need to figure out if it
is
there on purpose or not?

In the mean time, here is a patch that should solve it for you.

diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index b907073..2d92c89 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ struct sctp_association *sctp_id2assoc(struct
sock
*sk,
sctp_assoc_t id)
                     if (!list_empty(&sctp_sk(sk)->ep->asocs))
                             asoc =
list_entry(sctp_sk(sk)->ep->asocs.next,
                                               struct
sctp_association,
asocs);
-               return asoc;
+               goto done;
             }

             /* Otherwise this is a UDP-style socket. */
@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ struct sctp_association *sctp_id2assoc(struct
sock
*sk,
sctp_assoc_t id)
             asoc = (struct sctp_association
*)idr_find(&sctp_assocs_id,
(int)id);
             spin_unlock_bh(&sctp_assocs_id_lock);

+done:
             if (!asoc || (asoc->base.sk != sk) ||
asoc->base.dead)
                     return NULL;


Vlad,

Looking at the kdump from the panic, I am seeing that your patch
above
may not work in this case since the asoc is valid, the base.sk is
valid, and base.dead is 0.  Unless base.sk is valid but doesn't
match
sk, this wouldn't appear to fix this issue.





Hm..  If the association is not marked "dead", it should still have
all
its
transports present.  If you look at the peer.transport_addr_list in
you kdump, is that list empty or not?

Are any other peer transport pointers set (active_path,
retran_path)?


crash> p ((struct sctp_association *) 0xffff8107670e3000).peer
$14 = {
      rwnd = 65535,
      transport_addr_list = {
        next = 0xffff8107670e3180,
        prev = 0xffff8107670e3180
      },
      transport_count = 0,
      port = 3868,
      primary_path = 0x0,
      primary_addr = {
        v4 = {
          sin_family = 0,
          sin_port = 0,
          sin_addr = {
            s_addr = 0
          },
          __pad = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"
        },
        v6 = {
          sin6_family = 0,
          sin6_port = 0,
          sin6_flowinfo = 0,
          sin6_addr = {
            in6_u = {
              u6_addr8 =
"\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000",
              u6_addr16 = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
              u6_addr32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}
            }
          },
          sin6_scope_id = 0
        },
        sa = {
          sa_family = 0,
          sa_data =
"\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"
        }
      },
      active_path = 0x0,
      retran_path = 0x0,
      last_sent_to = 0x0,
      last_data_from = 0x0,
      tsn_map = {
        tsn_map = 0x0,
        base_tsn = 0,
        cumulative_tsn_ack_point = 0,
        max_tsn_seen = 0,
        len = 0,
        pending_data = 0,
        num_dup_tsns = 0,
        dup_tsns = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}
      },
      sack_needed = 1 '\001',
      sack_cnt = 0,
      ecn_capable = 0 '\0',
      ipv4_address = 1 '\001',
      ipv6_address = 0 '\0',
      hostname_address = 0 '\0',
      asconf_capable = 0 '\0',
      prsctp_capable = 0 '\0',
      auth_capable = 0 '\0',
      adaptation_ind = 0,
      addip_disabled_mask = 0,
      i = {
        init_tag = 0,
        a_rwnd = 0,
        num_outbound_streams = 0,
        num_inbound_streams = 0,
        initial_tsn = 0
      },
      cookie_len = 0,
      cookie = 0x0,
      addip_serial = 0,
      peer_random = 0x0,
      peer_chunks = 0x0,
      peer_hmacs = 0x0
}



Karl





Vlad,

One other thing, with the difficulty we are having recreating this
issue, is there any generic way to increase the likelihood for the
transport to be cleared out while delaying the association cleanup?
Is there any way that the association is initialized without any
transport information?





When the association is initialized, the lists are empty, but the
next
thing that happens is that we add transport of the destination we
are
sending to or receiving from to the association and mark it as
primary
and
active.  All this happens under a socket lock, so getsockopt can't
access the association until all actions on that association
complete.


The reason I ask; we believe the issue is
happening very shortly after the association is brought up (we
bring
it up and then do the getsockopt()).





Can you check what the association state is?  Alternately, can you
provide
the kdump and the kernel so I can dig around.




crash> p ((struct sctp_association *) 0xffff8107670e3000).state
$15 = SCTP_STATE_CLOSED





Hi Karl

Was this the client or the server side?  Also what was the socket type
(STREAM or SEQPACKET)?

-vlad





Thanks
-vlad





Thanks,
Karl




We believe this is occurring on the client side (still working on
confirming, this system is a Diameter router so we get connections
going in both directions).  The connections are all STREAM.  We are
also seeing ABORTs fairly regularly on the connections in suspect.

Karl



So we finally got a capture around the time of the panic.  The
panicing system is acting as a server and the client is connecting,
gets through INIT and COOKIE_ECHO, and sends several data packets when
the client sends another INIT.  At this point, the server handles the
INIT, starts over and it starts sending data packets again when the
server sends an ABORT because the application doesn't support
restarting the connection.



Do you know if this is done through SO_LINGER or with sendmsg and
MSG_ABORT?

-vlad


   It is around this time that the panic
occurs.  One thing that I noticed is that the sctp_association
structure looks awfully similar to a temporary association that is
created when an unexpected INIT is received, but before it is
populated with peer information. However the temp value is not set to
0 as would be expected.

Karl



This is done with SO_LINGER.  However, we just were able to reproduce the
issue.

When a duplicate cookie-echo message is received, and the
sctp_sf_do_5_2_4_dupcook() => sctp_unpack_cookie() is called, it calls
sctp_association_new() instead of sctp_make_temp_asoc(), and ends up
creating a full-fledged association instead of one with "temp" set.
Now, if we enter collision case, the primary path does not get written
in the association. When the next command is set to SCTP_CMD_NEW_ASOC,
since the association does not have "temp" marked, it gets added to
the association hash table and the endpoint. Even when the command
SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB is processed, since the association is not
temporary, the following check in sctp_cmd_delete_tcb() prevents the
association from being deleted from the hash table or the endpoint.

                  if (sctp_style(sk, TCP) && sctp_sstate(sk, LISTENING) &&
                      (!asoc->temp) && (sk->sk_shutdown != SHUTDOWN_MASK))
                                  return;

                  sctp_unhash_established(asoc);
       <<< never reached
                  sctp_association_free(asoc);
             <<< never reached

When we duplicate the traffic using netem, we are able to get this to
occur when getsockopt(SCTP_STATUS) is called due to the transport
being NULL.

Karl


Hi Karl

Yep, this is the code I've been looking at as well, just didn't get far
enough.  I was focusing the dookcook_a case().

I'm attaching a patch (untested) that should fix this.

-vlad



Vlad,

That looks promising, however SCTP_CMD_SET_ASOC doesn't exist in this
(2.6.36.2) SCTP stack.  I will look into backporting this side effect
state or finding an alternate way of preventing the association from
being added to the endpoint.

Karl

Vlad,

I have another kernel which experiences panics with the same
duplicated SCTP traffic and has a SCTP stack from 3.1.7, to which your
previous patch cleanly applies.  Unfortunately, the panic now occurs
when sctp_unhash_established() is called from sctp_cmd_delete_tcb(),
attempting to delete a node from the association base.

There was a patch to address this.

2eebc1e188e9e45886ee00662519849339884d6d
 sctp: Fix list corruption resulting from freeing an association on a list

This should be in stable. Can you make sure you have that patch in your tree?


As a test, I attempted the crude method of setting all associations
generated from sctp_unpack_cookie() in sctp_sf_do_5_2_4_dupcook() to
be temporary associations and we are unable to panic the system.  From
my (somewhat poor) understanding, however, this would break the
behavior described in the RFC for case 'A' and possibly 'B'.  Does it
make sense instead to modify case 'A' and 'B' to alter asoc instead of
new_asoc and leave new_asoc as a temporary association for all cases?

Technically, it might be safe to tag the new_asoc at "temporary" in the 'A' and 'B' cases, and may be even in all of them, since we'll be destroying it at the end of the duplicate cookie processing. I don't think this would break things, since we actually try to modify the existing 'asoc' based on all the values we've written into 'new_assoc'.

I am concerned however about the above crash, and I hope that above patch should fix it for your. If it does, changing the command is
the best solution as that is exactly what we want.  Changing the 'temp'
flag on the fly is a bit dangerous and may have unintended side effects.

-vlad

Thanks for the patience and help so far.

Karl


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux