On 03/05/2015 08:06 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
If we would do what Nic proposed - modify SCST such that it uses configfs instead of sysfs - then that would result in the removal of at least one SCST feature that is important to its users, namely automatic population of the configuration filesystem with hardware target port information. Apparently Nic does not want to convert LIO from configfs to sysfs.
Clearly configfs is here to stay, but is there anything that says LIO couldn't have both? Besides the issue at hand, there are some other bits of useful info in LIO that aren't available because of configfs' limitations, but that would be possible via sysfs.
-- Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
