On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 12:35:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > What's the transition plan for userspace? If you look at glibc > currently, it supplies both scsi.h and scsi_ioctl.h. If we're > persuading the glibc folks to go with our versions from uapi, I think > removing a file which is an effective compile breaker for userspace is a > really bad idea. Duplicating scsi_ioctl.h definitions in scsi.h would > also cause them problems. I thought about this a whіle ago, and I think reusing scsi/*.h is a bad idea exactly because glibc provides old versions of these. I'd suggest adding a linux/uapi/scsi_ioctl.h instead. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
