Re: esp_scsi QTAG in FAS216

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2014-04-06 22:33 GMT+02:00 Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hello Dave, Tuomas,
>
> >> Also, looking at the timeout formulae in the old NCR53C9x.c driver,
> >> the values would be different for FAS216. Why was this dropped from
> >> the modern esp_scsi?
> >
> > I've never seen a formula for any ESP or FAS chip for the timeout
> > other than the one mentioned in huge comment in
> > esp_set_clock_params(), although I do see the 7668 instead of 8192
> > factor being used in the old NCR53C9x driver.
>
> I haven't gone far enough back in the 53C9x revision history to be
> certain. but it would seem to me that Kars de Jong added that FAS
> special case.
>
> Can you confirm that, Kars? Any recollection as to the reason?

That is the value that's in the data manual of the Symbios Logic
SYM53CF94/96-2 (the actual chip that's in my Amiga SCSI controller).

Funny, according to the QLogic FAS2x6 manual the value should be 7682
for FAS216/216U/236/236U chips...

I don't think it's all that important. It only means that the actual
selection timeout used by the chip will be slightly shorter than it is
supposed to be.


Kind regards,

Kars.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux