On 10/16/2013 02:52 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > But seeing that this approach raises quite some issues I've attached a > different patch. Vaughan, could you test with that, too? Should be > functionally equivalent to the previous one. Cheers, Hannes Hi Hannes, We only tested the later patch which returns _TARGET_PRESENT after parsing sense, it works as expected. About the cause of this issue, admin said he is configuring a active-active cluster mode storage. Each node has it own LUN pool and a set of rule to control which node can access the pool. LUN7 is owned and can only be able to manipulated by the other node, but can be seen by this node for a misconfig. So it presents itself in REPORT_LUN but return NOT_READY when accessed through this node. Do you still regard this as a misbehave in response to INQUIRY? Thanks, Vaughan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
