Re: Is there any plan to support 64bit lun in mainline?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hannes Reinecke, on 10/14/2013 11:01 PM wrote:
> And HBAs like lpfc or qla2xxx even have a fast command abort built
> into the firmware, where the firmware will not even wait for a
> command abort to hit the wire but rather just disable the exchange
> internally and return.

Doing so is asking for data corruption. Aborts intended to cleanup commands on the
target, so they could not anyhow badly interact with future commands. Otherwise it is
possible that an old WRITE command stuck in some deep corner inside the target, be
bypassed by such pseudo-abort and then got released AFTER its LBAs written by newer
data, hence overwrite new data by old data.

Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux