Il 25/05/2013 06:14, James Bottomley ha scritto: > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:32 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 24/05/2013 10:03, James Bottomley ha scritto: >>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone in the real world actually care about this bug? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, or I would move on and not waste so much time on this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fine, so produce a simple fix for this bug which we can discuss that's >>>>>>> not tied to this feature. >>>>> >>>>> Honestly, I have no idea how this is even possible. >>> Really? It looks to me like a simple block on the commands for disk >>> devices in the opcode switch would do it (with a corresponding change to >>> sg.c:sg_allow_access). >> >> Which switch? What I can do is something like this in blk_verify_command: > > not in blk_verify_command: outside of it, in the three places it's used. In other words, if (blk_verify_command(...) || blk_verify_command_with_queue(q, ...)) We must have different taste. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
