Il 24/05/2013 09:50, James Bottomley ha scritto: > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 09:43 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 24/05/2013 09:36, James Bottomley ha scritto: >>> On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 15:58 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> Adjust the blk_verify_command function to let it look at per-queue >>>> data. This will be done in the next patch. >>> >>> This is not a bug fix. This is an enabler for your complex and to my >>> mind dubious rework of the SG_IO command filter. I'm running out of >>> ways to say please don't mix bug fixes with features, because this >>> redesignating of the original patch set as part 1 and parts 2,3 doesn't >>> satisfy the requirement. >> >> I made it part 1/2/3 because parts 2/3 depend on part 1. It makes >> dependency tracking easier, at least in my mind. >> >> If you have another solution that does not require passing request_queue >> to blk_verify_command, I'm all ears. > > That's a circular response that doesn't answer the question. The actual > question is: what is simple fix for the bug that isn't entangled with > enabling the SG_IO per device type whitelist feature. > >>> Does anyone in the real world actually care about this bug? >> >> Yes, or I would move on and not waste so much time on this. > > Fine, so produce a simple fix for this bug which we can discuss that's > not tied to this feature. Honestly, I have no idea how this is even possible. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
