Il 24/05/2013 09:36, James Bottomley ha scritto: > On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 15:58 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Adjust the blk_verify_command function to let it look at per-queue >> data. This will be done in the next patch. > > This is not a bug fix. This is an enabler for your complex and to my > mind dubious rework of the SG_IO command filter. I'm running out of > ways to say please don't mix bug fixes with features, because this > redesignating of the original patch set as part 1 and parts 2,3 doesn't > satisfy the requirement. I made it part 1/2/3 because parts 2/3 depend on part 1. It makes dependency tracking easier, at least in my mind. If you have another solution that does not require passing request_queue to blk_verify_command, I'm all ears. > Does anyone in the real world actually care about this bug? Yes, or I would move on and not waste so much time on this. Paolo > because if > not perhaps we can just remove the confusion and consider this as a > feature set. If there's someone who actually cares, please lets just do > the bug fix first and argue about the feature later. > > James > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
