On 08/24/2012 04:08 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > A quote from SPC-4: "While in the unavailable primary target port > asymmetric access state, the device server shall support those of > the following commands that it supports while in the active/optimized > state: [ ... ] d) SET TARGET PORT GROUPS; [ ... ]". Hence enable > sending STPG to a target port group that is in the unavailable state. > > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c | 3 +-- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c > index 08d80a6..a05d469 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c > @@ -641,8 +641,7 @@ static int alua_rtpg(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct alua_dh_data *h) > h->state = TPGS_STATE_STANDBY; > break; > case TPGS_STATE_OFFLINE: > - case TPGS_STATE_UNAVAILABLE: > - /* Path unusable for unavailable/offline */ > + /* Path unusable */ > err = SCSI_DH_DEV_OFFLINED; > break; > default: > Hey, was this patch ok Hannes and James and others? I see bb2c94a3a6ad37fe7d34f369295bcdf5387e264f was merged, but this one was not. I was thinking this might have got missed because it has the same patch description as bb2c94a3a6ad37fe7d34f369295bcdf5387e264f, so it is confusion, but they are different patches. One fixes alua_rtpg and one fixes alua_activate, but both are needed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
