On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 06/09/12 23:57, Muthu Kumar wrote: >> >>> Locking change is the one you posted already (the link above). Anyway, >>> I have the attached patch *including* the locking change. Original >>> mail has attachment without locking change. Please use whatever you >>> need. >> >> >> While we are at it ... the rq->rq_disk and rq->end_io assignments can be >> performed safely before the spinlock is taken, isn't it ? >> > > Yes.. that spinlock is to protect the q. > Attached patch with assignment performed before taking the spinlock. > >> Bart.
Attachment:
blk-exec-assign-endio-to-bart-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
