On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/09/12 00:10, Muthu Kumar wrote:
>
>> Since the queue->lock case is taken care of in the following patch:
>>
>> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg59845.html [PATCH 1/4]
>> block: Fix race on request_queue.end_io invocations)
>>
>> Updated the patch with just the end_io assignment before dead queue check.
>>
>>
>
>
> This patch does not apply since it's line-wrapped and a part is missing
> in the second hunk. However, if I had overlooked your original patch
> then I want to apologize.
>
Please use the attached file since gmail messes with the line wraps.
> If you can resend your original patch including the locking changes then
> I'll test it further.
>
Locking change is the one you posted already (the link above). Anyway,
I have the attached patch *including* the locking change. Original
mail has attachment without locking change. Please use whatever you
need.
Thanks for testing.
Regards,
Muthu
> Bart.
diff --git a/block/blk-exec.c b/block/blk-exec.c
index fb2cbd5..284bf56 100644
--- a/block/blk-exec.c
+++ b/block/blk-exec.c
@@ -53,16 +53,17 @@ void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk *bd_disk,
WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+ rq->rq_disk = bd_disk;
+ rq->end_io = done;
+
if (unlikely(blk_queue_dead(q))) {
- spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
rq->errors = -ENXIO;
if (rq->end_io)
rq->end_io(rq, rq->errors);
+ spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
return;
}
- rq->rq_disk = bd_disk;
- rq->end_io = done;
__elv_add_request(q, rq, where);
__blk_run_queue(q);
/* the queue is stopped so it won't be run */
