On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/09/12 23:57, Muthu Kumar wrote: > >> Locking change is the one you posted already (the link above). Anyway, >> I have the attached patch *including* the locking change. Original >> mail has attachment without locking change. Please use whatever you >> need. > > > While we are at it ... the rq->rq_disk and rq->end_io assignments can be > performed safely before the spinlock is taken, isn't it ? > Yes.. that spinlock is to protect the q. > Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
