On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:44:43AM -0800, Andy Grover wrote: > On 01/20/2012 08:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:39:17PM -0800, Andy Grover wrote: > >> This saves all fabrics from calling core_tmr_alloc_req() and > >> having to check the result. The downside is se_cmd gets bigger for all > >> requests, but hopefully later patches will reduce it. > > > > Without patches to void the overhead it's not acceptable. Fortunately > > it should be doable fairly simply by using an union for command vs > > TMR fields. > > This was my thought too. We should be able to move cmd variables into a > union w/tmr struct very soon, with a low risk of introducing bugs. Any plans on going back to this? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
