Re: [PATCH 3/3] tcm ibmvscsis driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:50:40 +0100
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> - send_rsp() sends back an SRP response with req_lim_delta = 1 before
> srp_iu_put() is invoked. I think this is a race condition: it can
> happen that the SRP initiator has received an SRP_RSP and sends a new
> SRP_CMD before srp_iu_put() was invoked. On a heavily loaded system
> that can trigger a queue overflow in the target.

Yeah, we had better to handle such case better.

But I don't think that we hit a critical event such as crash, memory
corruption, etc, with the current code.

In such case, srp_iu_get return NULL, so the target ignores the
request, then eventually the initiator recovers.

Probably, we should set the queue size to INITIAL_SRP_LIMIT + 1.


> - As anyone can see in the driver code (and as specified in the PAPR)
> management datagrams (MADs) fall outside the SRP credit mechanism.
> Hence not reserving one credit (assuming that the initiator makes sure
> there is at most one outstanding MAD) for MAD can - at least in theory
> - trigger a queue overflow.

I think that MAD is used only before the initiator starts real
I/Os. So I don't think that we can hit this issue in reality.


Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux