Re: I/O topology fixes for big physical block size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Jens> With the revised understanding that this is purely the IO hint,
Jens> then yes I agree we should not clamp it.

Ok, here's an updated sd patch that does not print a warning...


sd: Fix overflow with big physical blocks

The hw_sector_size variable could overflow if a device reported huge
physical blocks.  Switch to the more accurate physical_block_size
terminology and make sure we use an unsigned int to match the range
permitted by READ CAPACITY(16).

Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index ffa0689..5446c4d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -1554,7 +1554,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
 	}
 
 	/* Logical blocks per physical block exponent */
-	sdkp->hw_sector_size = (1 << (buffer[13] & 0xf)) * sector_size;
+	sdkp->physical_block_size = (1 << (buffer[13] & 0xf)) * sector_size;
 
 	/* Lowest aligned logical block */
 	alignment = ((buffer[14] & 0x3f) << 8 | buffer[15]) * sector_size;
@@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
 		struct request_queue *q = sdp->request_queue;
 
 		sdkp->thin_provisioning = 1;
-		q->limits.discard_granularity = sdkp->hw_sector_size;
+		q->limits.discard_granularity = sdkp->physical_block_size;
 		q->limits.max_discard_sectors = 0xffffffff;
 
 		if (buffer[14] & 0x40) /* TPRZ */
@@ -1635,7 +1635,7 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
 	}
 
 	sdkp->capacity = lba + 1;
-	sdkp->hw_sector_size = sector_size;
+	sdkp->physical_block_size = sector_size;
 	return sector_size;
 }
 
@@ -1756,10 +1756,10 @@ got_data:
 				  (unsigned long long)sdkp->capacity,
 				  sector_size, cap_str_10, cap_str_2);
 
-			if (sdkp->hw_sector_size != sector_size)
+			if (sdkp->physical_block_size != sector_size)
 				sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp,
 					  "%u-byte physical blocks\n",
-					  sdkp->hw_sector_size);
+					  sdkp->physical_block_size);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -1773,7 +1773,8 @@ got_data:
 	else if (sector_size == 256)
 		sdkp->capacity >>= 1;
 
-	blk_queue_physical_block_size(sdp->request_queue, sdkp->hw_sector_size);
+	blk_queue_physical_block_size(sdp->request_queue,
+				      sdkp->physical_block_size);
 	sdkp->device->sector_size = sector_size;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.h b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
index f81a930..f947140 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ struct scsi_disk {
 	atomic_t	openers;
 	sector_t	capacity;	/* size in 512-byte sectors */
 	u32		index;
-	unsigned short	hw_sector_size;
+	unsigned int	physical_block_size;
 	u8		media_present;
 	u8		write_prot;
 	u8		protection_type;/* Data Integrity Field */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux