On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:11:34AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:51:22AM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:14:56AM -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > USB Attached SCSI is a new protocol specified jointly by the SCSI T10 > > > committee and the USB Implementors Forum. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > MAINTAINERS | 8 + > > > drivers/usb/storage/Kconfig | 13 + > > > drivers/usb/storage/Makefile | 1 + > > > drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 751 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 4 files changed, 773 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 drivers/usb/storage/uas.c > > > > Given that this is distinctly not usb-storage, and it is entirely contained > > within a single file, does it really belong in the drivers/usb/storage > > directory? > > > > That just seems like a plan for confusion. The fact that there is a big > > "this is not usb-storage" message in the comments of uas.c would seem to > > support this position. > > > > Given that it is a single file, I would put it in drivers/usb directly. If > > you wanted your own directory for possible future refactoring into multiple > > files or addid other files (like usb-storage did to support oddball > > devices), then maybe create a drivers/usb/uas directory. > > What about drivers/usb/class/ where a number of other USB class drivers > live. That would make more sense, right? No argument from me. Heck, maybe someone wants to move usb-storage into that directory also? My main point is that it doesn't belong in the same directory as usb-storage. There are lots of good alternatives. Matt -- Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver It's not that hard. No matter what the problem is, tell the customer to reinstall Windows. -- Nurse User Friendly, 3/22/1998
Attachment:
pgp6rHNr87owq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
