On 2010-09-10 15:17, Christof Schmitt wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:01:06PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 2010-09-10 14:52, Christof Schmitt wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:41:27AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> >>>> Jens> So this is a bug and we want to fix it, but it's not a strict >>>> Jens> regression against earlier releases. So based on that .37 should >>>> Jens> be fine. But there's definitely some reasons for shoving it into >>>> Jens> .35 as well. What was your intention? >>>> >>>> I was aiming at 2.6.37 since it's a pretty big change to wedge in this >>>> late in the .36 cycle. And the zfcp DIX support is only experimental. >>>> >>>> But that's really Christof's call. My concern wrt. 2.6.36 is purely >>>> process-related, I don't have any technical objections. >>> >>> It is a missing piece for the experimental DIX support in zfcp. Since >>> we tell everybody that it is "experimental", merging the patches only >>> for 2.6.37 is fine for me. >> >> Great, I'll queue it up for 2.6.37. > > Are you picking up the zfcp patch as well? Yep -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
