Re: Limit number of integrity segments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Jens> So this is a bug and we want to fix it, but it's not a strict
Jens> regression against earlier releases. So based on that .37 should
Jens> be fine. But there's definitely some reasons for shoving it into
Jens> .35 as well. What was your intention?

I was aiming at 2.6.37 since it's a pretty big change to wedge in this
late in the .36 cycle.  And the zfcp DIX support is only experimental.

But that's really Christof's call.  My concern wrt. 2.6.36 is purely
process-related, I don't have any technical objections.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux