On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:41:27AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Jens> So this is a bug and we want to fix it, but it's not a strict > Jens> regression against earlier releases. So based on that .37 should > Jens> be fine. But there's definitely some reasons for shoving it into > Jens> .35 as well. What was your intention? > > I was aiming at 2.6.37 since it's a pretty big change to wedge in this > late in the .36 cycle. And the zfcp DIX support is only experimental. > > But that's really Christof's call. My concern wrt. 2.6.36 is purely > process-related, I don't have any technical objections. It is a missing piece for the experimental DIX support in zfcp. Since we tell everybody that it is "experimental", merging the patches only for 2.6.37 is fine for me. -- Christof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
