Re: [RFC] relaxed barrier semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 11:32:04PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> New flag.. Easy to add, hard to live with. Aren't you already tied of 
> the existing flags hell?

I'm tired of flags without a very well defined meaning.  For example
I'm really tired of the current REQ_HARDBARRIER because it means so
amy different things.

A must do pre-flush or must do FUA flag is very different from a must
not reorder flag.  Overloading the meaning is what got us into this
mess.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux