Re: [RFC] relaxed barrier semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Mason, on 08/02/2010 09:39 PM wrote:
I regret putting the ordering into the original barrier code...it
definitely did help reiserfs back in the day but it stinks of magic and
voodoo.

But if the ordering isn't in the common (block) code, how to implement the "hardware offload" for ordering, i.e. ORDERED commands, in an acceptable way?

I believe, the decision was right, but the flags and magic requests based interface (and, hence, implementation) was wrong. That's it which stinks of magic and voodoo.

Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux