Re: [RFC] relaxed barrier semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:11:56PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> Chris Mason, on 08/02/2010 09:39 PM wrote:
> >I regret putting the ordering into the original barrier code...it
> >definitely did help reiserfs back in the day but it stinks of magic and
> >voodoo.
> 
> But if the ordering isn't in the common (block) code, how to implement 
> the "hardware offload" for ordering, i.e. ORDERED commands, in an 
> acceptable way?

Right now we have no working implementation of actually using ordered
tags for a storage device in Linux.  There's very little need for common
code in that implementation - basically we just need flag in the bio /
request to make this one an ordered tag in addition to the existing
reordering preventing in the block queue.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux