Re: qla2xxx: Conditionally disable automatic queue full tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I will be more than willing to do these changes. Just curious, was this seen on non qla2xxx drivers too.

-- Giri


On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Michael Reed wrote:

To answer your query, yes.  Ultimately, I believe the ml should be
modified to view a user space modification to a lun's queue depth
as an upper bound.  I don't care, much, whether the system dynamically
adjusts the queue depth or leaves it alone as long as it honors the
value programmed via user space.

Are you volunteering to do the work?  :)  How can I help?

Thanks,
Mike


Giridhar Malavali wrote:
Hi Michael,

Here are the patches..

http://marc.info/?a=119828370000006&r=1&w=2 .
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=125201657106722&w=2

Thanks,
Giridhar.M.B



On Sep 24, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Michael Reed wrote:

Hello,

The purpose of the queue full tracking patch in qla2xxx is to
keep the driver from changing a user space override of the queue
depth back to what the driver believes is the "correct" value.

The raid devices that we use have per raid controller queue depth
limits and have at times demonstrated, uh, bad behavior when
their queues are full for sustained periods of time.  SGI needs
to be able to set queue depth for a lun based upon access patterns
and performance requirements of the entire cluster and know that
it will be honored as an upper bound.

Might you provide a pointer to the recently submitted patches?
I haven't followed linux-scsi in a while....  I'll be quite
happy to take a look.

Thanks,
Mike


Giridhar Malavali wrote:
Hi Michael/James,

	Patches were submitted to move queue ramp up/down code recently to
scsi mid layer. With this change, I don't see a need for a module
parameter to disable queuefull tracking  in qla2xxx driver. Andrew,
mentioned that this got introduced to avoid wobbling behavior on the
wire due to queue depth modifications. Just wanted to check whether
the same need to be done in scsi mid layer too.


Thanks,
Giridhar.M.B

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux