RE: Question regarding protocol specific mtu for FCoE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 12:16 -0700, Zou, Yi wrote:
>[...]
>> FCoE is on L2 layer, no path specific MTU, everything goes out as
>> whatever mtu known to the nic. Since the nic is expected to be used
>for
>> converged traffic involving multiple traffic types, e.g. LAN, FCoE, I
>> was wondering if it makes sense to have the additional MTU.
>Essentially,
>> the nic driver will be able to setup via netdev for different MTUs
>for
>> converged traffic.
>
>Wouldn't you use separate VLANs for FCoE and other traffic?  So maybe
>we
>should allow for per-VLAN rather than per-protocol MTU.
>
>Ben.
>
>From what I can tell, you will not be able to set vlan device's MTU
that is larger than the real_dev->mtu, as in vlan_dev_change_mtu().

Thanks.

yi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux