RE: Question regarding protocol specific mtu for FCoE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 12:16 -0700, Zou, Yi wrote:
[...]
> FCoE is on L2 layer, no path specific MTU, everything goes out as
> whatever mtu known to the nic. Since the nic is expected to be used for
> converged traffic involving multiple traffic types, e.g. LAN, FCoE, I
> was wondering if it makes sense to have the additional MTU. Essentially,
> the nic driver will be able to setup via netdev for different MTUs for
> converged traffic.

Wouldn't you use separate VLANs for FCoE and other traffic?  So maybe we
should allow for per-VLAN rather than per-protocol MTU.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux