Re: Question regarding protocol specific mtu for FCoE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Zou, Yi wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to figure out a way to support a different MTU for Fiber
Channel over Ethernet (FCoE), where it is preferred to have a baby jumbo
frame with MTU=2158 (14 bytes FCoE header + 24 bytes FC header + 2112
bytes max FC payload + 4 bytes FC CRC + 4 bytes FCoE trailer).

Similar to nedev->mtu being used everywhere for LAN traffic, I wonder if
it is desirable or feasible to add another protocol specific MTU (which
is my case is FCoE) to netdev so any eth driver supporting converged
traffic (e.g. LAN + FCoE) over netdev can make use of it.

Do FCoE upper layers have anything analagous to a TCP_MAXSEG option? That allows an application using TCP to ask for a smaller MSS than TCP might have chosen otherwise.

Would a NIC over which FCoE was running be able to be of two minds of what the MTU happens to be? I'd think that if one user of the NIC needed/wanted and MTU > foo one would just set the MTU large enough to include foo and be done with it?

In IP networking space at least, if there is a destination for which one does not want to use the default MTU, one can set-up a destination-specific (Path) MTU in the routing table that will (if smaller) override the link-local MTU for traffic going to/from that destination.

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux