On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 08:56:25AM -0600, Mukker, Atul wrote: > [Atul] I think we are close, for example, memcpy API in the stack is osi_memcpy(), which translates to memcpy() on Linux and ScsiPortMoveMemory() on windows. The solution to "We have some people who speak French and other people who speak German" is not to invent Esperanto ;-) Using one or the other internally is fine (we don't care what you do), but we want to see memcpy(). By the way, the documentation I found for ScsiPortMoveMemory() seems to indicate that it's memmove(), not memcpy(). Mapping memcpy() to ScsiPortMoveMemory() is fine ... but you can't realiably go the other way. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
