RE: [RFQ] New driver architecture questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>
> >> Perhaps this is a bad example?  It seems like the "common layer"
> >> sections that are "cross-OS" shouldn't contain any Linux specific code
> at all.
> >
> > I think the implication is that the cross-OS parts are coded, as it
> > happens, in the linux coding style, using linux functions, but then a
> > Windows layer maps these to Windows specific functions.
> 
> Correct.
> 
> 	Jeff
> 
> 
> 
[Atul] I think we are close, for example, memcpy API in the stack is osi_memcpy(), which translates to memcpy() on Linux and ScsiPortMoveMemory() on windows.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux