On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Taking drivers/net/e1000e as an > example, > > hw.h hardware-specific defines, ~cross-OS > 82571.c code specific to 8257x chip family, ~cross-OS 82571.c contains Linux specific code such as: including Linux specific header files, calls to msleep(). > ich8lan.c code specific to ICH8+ chip family, ~cross-OS ich8lan.c contains Linux specific code such as: might_sleep(), mutex_trylock(), mutex_unlock(), udelay(), msleep(), writel(), readl(). Perhaps this is a bad example? It seems like the "common layer" sections that are "cross-OS" shouldn't contain any Linux specific code at all. -Adam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
