Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > Hi James, > > Are your concerns answered ? > > Hannes, Kay, > > Is the description related to bus notify BIND DEVICE issue clear now ? > > Please respond :) > Yes, issue is clearer now. Basically this is another instance where multi-driver binding would make a difference. Using the 'notifier_chain' approach is basically doing the very same thing whilst _not_ using driver core binding. So from that point of view: Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> However, I would really like to see it merged with my ALUA update for scsi_dh; for ALUA matching on the vendor/product tuple is really quite pointless and we should be using the 'TPGS' setting in the inquiry data. Trading your ack for mine :-) Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html