On 03/19/2009 02:54 PM, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 12:18 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 19:30 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:36, Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> From: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> This patch allows the use of modaliases on scsi targets to correctly
>>>> load scsi device handler modules when the devices are found.
>>>> +++ linux-2.6.28/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
>>>> @@ -454,4 +454,10 @@ struct dmi_system_id {
>>>>
>>>> #define DMI_MATCH(a, b) { a, b }
>>>>
>>>> +struct scsi_dh_device_id {
>>>> + unsigned char type;
>>>> + char vendor[9];
>>>> + char model[17];
>>>> +};
>>> Doesn't the static array waste space, when used for the long lists of
>>> entries stuffed in arrays of this structure? It will carry a lot of \0
>>> chars, and identical strings can not be de-duplicated by the compiler,
>>> unlike when pointers are used?
>>>
>> I had some problems when we used the pointers instead of arrays. Don't
>> recall it now.
>>
>> Will retry and report.
>
> Hi Kay,
>
> I tried it and realized modpost is what is giving the problem.
>
> When the array for vendor and model is changed to pointers, modpost (at
> the end of make modules) dies with a segmentation fault.
>
> Peter, Any details that you can provide ?
In this case, the tail wags the dog -- it's a string instead of a pointer basicallly so that the new bits in file2alias.c can look like the other parts of that same file. It's sortof inconvenient for them to be pointers in there...
--
Peter
If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.
-- Einstein
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
