RE: [PATCH 1/6] mpt fusion: fix for previous patch taskmgmt in progress should be cleared before return

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James,

I am really sorry for my previous reply. Actually checkpatch is reporting correctly, but my understanding was wrong. I am going to correct it and resending it back.  
 
Thanks
Kashyap

-----Original Message-----
From: James Bottomley [mailto:James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 6:47 PM
To: Desai, Kashyap
Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Moore, Eric; Prakash, Sathya
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/6] mpt fusion: fix for previous patch taskmgmt in progress should be cleared before return

On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 15:15 +0530, Desai, Kashyap wrote:
> James,
> 
> After creating patch, I usually run check_patch script available in scripts directory of linux source tree.
> Below changes are just to remove warning and error related to coding standards  from generated patch. 

Hmm, then we have an error in checkpatch.pl if it's saying that

x = y
if (x == NULL)

should become

if ((x = y) == NULL)

Can you attach the warning so I can get the checkpatch maintainers to
explain what's going on?

Thanks,

James


> If you suggest, not to have those changes merge with actual logical
> patch then please let me know. I can rework and resubmit.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Kashyap
> ________________________________________
> From: James Bottomley [James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 1:38 PM
> To: Desai, Kashyap
> Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Moore, Eric; Prakash, Sathya
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mpt fusion: fix for previous patch taskmgmt in progress should be cleared before return
> 
> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 17:19 +0530, Kashyap, Desai wrote:
> > -
> > -       mf = mpt_get_msg_frame(mptsasDeviceResetCtx, ioc);
> > -       if (mf == NULL) {
> > +       if ((mf = mpt_get_msg_frame(mptsasDeviceResetCtx, ioc)) == NULL) {
> >                 dfailprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_WARN_FMT
> 
> This is making a clear statement (assignment then check) less clear for
> no practical purpose that I can see.
> 
> James
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux