On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 04:37:06PM -0400, James Smart wrote: > The oem requirement we have explicitly states not to use the unbind > interface > (we proposed unbind at first as well). > > The issue is what happens on the link while we are bound for that short > amount of time. It confuses the things on the other side of the link. > There's a secondary driver that ends up binding to the adapters we exclude, > and the things on the other side only expected to see the second driver. By the way, are these interfaces real or virtual (SR-IOV virtual)? PCI bus numbers aren't the most stable way of referring to devices any more. I don't suppose we can key this off PCIe DSN, can we? -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
