Re: RFC: Transport identifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> The thing is we need to start sending RC16 to a lot of drives very soon
> because of the 4KB thing.  And as we've seen RC16 breaks a lot of junk
> devices.  So we need a good indicator other than the SCSI rev. because
> that unfortunately doesn't cut it.

/Is/ the used transport protocol a good indicator for whether a
particular target breaks by READ CAPACITY 16?  I have doubts.  Command
set support is independent of transport protocol support.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= --=- ===--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux