Re: RFC: Transport identifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:50:14 -0700
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:13:03PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > The following patch below sits somewhere between my original take and
> > your patch.  Those transports that have classes implemented fill out the
> > id like you did.  The ones that don't (ATA, FireWire and USB) set it
> > manually.  Best of both worlds, IMHO.
> 
> You seem to have missed the patch to scsi_transport_spi.c.
> There's also a lot of parallel SCSI drivers that don't use
> scsi_transport_spi.c yet.  I'm OK with them being 'unknown' and
> eventually people patching them (or perhaps better, converting them to
> use scsi_transport_spi!), but thought it was worth mentioning.

Yeah, that's why my patch sets SCSI_TRANSPORT_SPI to 0. So a lot of
parallel SCSI drivers that don't use spi class can get 'spi'
properly. It's better to convert them to use spi class but I really
doubt someone would do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux