On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:53:11PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote: > In addition, there are some subsystems (scsi) that are looking into some > differently sized endian helpers (be24) and it may be worthwhile to have > some agreement whether it is worth making them common infrastructure and > whether they should present a similar API to the common byteorder/unaligned > API. I still think SCSI should have its own accessors, even if they're just wrappers around the common BE code. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
