On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 17:09 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Looks true to me for the current versions of the code. In fact it is only > > > ever called from the initialisation function that I can see so chunks of > > > the code could simply go away as well as bits of the comment. Ditto the > > > one in drivers/scsi/st.c > > > > > > Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > I am sorry I didn't quite understand. You mean it is true that caller > > must hold os_scsi_tapes_lock? > > Sorry - I mean what you claim is true - that the comment is incorrect. So, I think I'm missing a piece of this: There's no patch in this thread (I presume it's lurking somewhere on lkml). Could someone repost the proposed patch and copy the tape maintainer: Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@xxxxxxxxxxx> to get his input? Thanks, James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
