> > Looks true to me for the current versions of the code. In fact it is only > > ever called from the initialisation function that I can see so chunks of > > the code could simply go away as well as bits of the comment. Ditto the > > one in drivers/scsi/st.c > > > > Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I am sorry I didn't quite understand. You mean it is true that caller > must hold os_scsi_tapes_lock? Sorry - I mean what you claim is true - that the comment is incorrect. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
